Home Forum
Sign Makers
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Background removal - Is Gimp sufficient? (1 viewing) (1) Guest
General Software
Go to bottom Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Background removal - Is Gimp sufficient?
#57
Rammy (User)
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 5
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Background removal - Is Gimp sufficient? 3 Years, 5 Months ago Karma: 0  
Photoshop appears to be one of the main products and I know that this will do it, but Gimp seems good enough for most of my needs, so why splash out.

I never quite get it perfect using gimp. Do I need to use special software?
Photoshop obviously is still selling despite Gimp being available, so is it really much better?

 
Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#58
Martin (Admin)
Moderator
Posts: 20
graph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male www.sign-update-magazine.co.uk Location: Staines - Middlesex Birthdate: 1974-03-12
Re:Background removal - Is Gimp sufficient? 3 Years, 5 Months ago Karma: 1  
I use gimp occasionally as well as CorelDraw.
Our typesetter uses Photoshop.

The impression I get from speaking to the typesetter, is that Photoshop has an easier interface and generally easier to use with a few extra features. Photoshop does have a nice extract filter that gimp doesn't.
It is more important to understand the techniques used by the software, than to have the cutting edge software. It does take a bit of trial and error.

In Photoshop, our typesetter says there are 3 ways that he uses:
1) Clipping path - Rarely used, but often chosen by the inexperienced. This gives a hard edge, but he often gets round this by adding light to the edge to break the sharpness.
2) Airbrush the background - He would normally add a bit of noise to the filter of the airbrush to make it look less perfect.
3) Use the extract filter - most common.

In Gimp I see 2 very similar options for the first 2, but there is no extract filter


Below I have found a tutorial that helps compare the 2.

blog.thembid.com/2007/08/24/removing-bac...quickly-in-the-gimp/

blog.thembid.com/2007/08/22/removing-bac...uickly-in-photoshop/

I think Gimp is sufficient for most things, but if doing this regularly photoshop is probably quicker and certainly worth investigating.

It doesn't even have to be limited to these products. For example Signlab has a Fluid mask plug-in for the removal of backgrounds:
www.sign-update-magazine.co.uk/images/st...-%20Fluid%20Mask.pdf
As well as the fluid mask add-in there is a Gimp add in, with Signlab.
 
Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2008/08/21 17:54 By Martin.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#59
Ross (User)
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 17
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Background removal - Is Gimp sufficient? 3 Years, 5 Months ago Karma: 0  
I have played with Gimp before getting photoshop.

They are both good enough for the job, but photoshop has a nicer feel to it and a little bit easier and quicker to use, with a few extra features.
 
Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#60
Rammy (User)
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 5
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Background removal - Is Gimp sufficient? 3 Years, 5 Months ago Karma: 0  
Thanks for your responses.

Perhaps I should learn a few techniques to soften the edges or put lighting on the edges.
 
Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top
Joomla Design By Compass